A 53-year-old man with no history of anemia or macrocytosis was newly diagnosed with HIV disease (viral load, 1 340 000 copies per mL; CD4 count, 0.089 × 109/L) and Burkitt lymphoma. A complete blood count showed anemia (hemoglobin, 10.1 g/dL; mean corpuscular volume, 86.8 fL), without other cytopenias.
The bone marrow aspirate was moderately hypocellular with 22% erythroid series that exhibited a severe dyserythropoiesis.
The most significant finding was the presence of internuclear bridging in 2% of the erythroblasts, most of them being between orthochromatic erythroblasts (panels A-G; original magnification ×1000, May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain); occasionally, the internuclear bridging was double and observed at the end of the cytokinesis (panel H; original magnification ×1000, May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain) and exceptionally between polychromatophilic erythroblasts (panel I; original magnification ×1000, May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain).
Bone marrow analysis was negative for Burkitt lymphoma. The karyotype was 46,XY20, and targeted next-generation sequencing had no findings. Internuclear bridging disappeared, and the viral load was undetectable following chemotherapeutic and antiretroviral therapies for 4 months.
Internuclear bridging between erythroblasts resulting from abnormal mitosis is an uncommon cytological feature highly suggestive of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Outside of myelodysplasia, this finding can be seen in congenital dyserythropoietic anemia. Its observation as a reactive phenomenon is rare. HIV disease usually causes hematopoietic dyspoiesis; however, additional internuclear bridging is not normally observed. An MDS was excluded and, at that time, the patient had not received any treatment.
I conceive you have mentioned some very interesting details , appreciate it for the post.
Hey very nice website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your I’m happy to find a lot of useful info here in the post, we need develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .
I couldn’t resist commenting 🙂
You made some good points there. I checked on the net for more info about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this web site.
I was curious if you ever thought of changing the layout of your blog?
Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people
could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two pictures.
Maybe you could space it out better?
I appreciate you sharing this blog. Will read on…