Though it can be a minefield, where unverified sources abound, searching the internet can help people to understand different health problems, and give them access to emotional and social support.
More and more people are going online to search for information about their health. By using the internet, patients can prepare for appointments, or follow up on issues that were raised in the consulting room but left them with unanswered questions.
But not everyone is so keen on patients using the internet in this way.
Some doctors and other heath professionals have doubts about the quality and usefulness of the information available.
Using the internet, we can prepare for appointments, or follow up on issues. But not everyone is keen on patients using the internet this way. Psychology experts explain how to get round it
There are also suggestions that ‘cyberchrondria’ may be fueling a surge in unnecessary tests and appointments.
Similarly, though so many people are using online resources to fill in gaps in their knowledge, or to help them ask the right questions, they may not be comfortable bringing it up in the consulting room.
For our latest research project, we wanted to find out just why it can be so difficult to discuss online information with doctors.
We found that in addition to people being embarrassed in case they have misunderstood the information, or can’t remember it accurately, they also fear a negative reaction from the doctor who may think they are difficult or challenging.
How to make it work
So how can you as a patient bring up online information with your doctor? First, it sounds obvious but you need a good, open relationship with your doctor. Tell them you have been looking online, but ask for their feedback on the information, and for any useful sites they know of.
We found that patients with a good doctor relationship felt able to discuss information and ideas from websites and online forums in a considered and critical manner.
Importantly, it is not about the patient trying to be the doctor.
Ideally, patients should bring along their information, use it to help explain their key concerns, or detail the options they’ve explored, but also make clear that they still want and value their doctor’s input on their findings.
Some of the patients we spoke to told us that they are acutely aware of their doctor’s negative feelings towards the internet. In these situations, people are sometimes tempted to disguise the source of their information.
Rather than openly discussing their findings from the internet, they may pretend they got the information elsewhere when mentioning it to their doctor or be very careful not to reveal its origin at all.
For some people we spoke to, the process of trying to integrate the results of their web searches into their communications with the GP was frustrating to say the least.
They felt uncomfortable, embarrassed, and sometimes held back key information. This made for unproductive meetings which were felt to be a waste of time.
This process can definitely be improved.
As more appointments are going to be conducted over smartphone rather than face to face, and some doctors have admitted using Wikipedia to diagnose patients, the rest of the process needs to catch up with technology.
There needs to be a new and more productive way to integrate online information into doctor-patient discussions. First of all, there should be better ways for patients to collect and organise accurate information online so that they can organise their thoughts and prepare for a visit.
In the consulting room itself, doctors should use the research as an opportunity to have more productive discussions, and use it as a way to teach patients more about their own health issues.
They need to question the information source, message and credibility, but doctors could also use it as an opportunity to nudge patients to think about their health options and consider what’s important to them.
Just as a doctor is not solely responsible for the health of a patient, neither is the patient themselves.
Internet research can no longer be dismissed.
Even if inaccurate, it can help build a better relationship between patient and doctor, and give them both a better understanding of managing health in the modern world.
This article was originally published by The Conversation